Community Interactions – Sadly, Drone, Engaged in Search for Missing Dog, Shot Out of the SkyFebruary 26, 2019 6 By Scott Hinkle
A drone, engaged in search efforts for a missing dog was shot out of the sky. This is just another reason for the need for positive community interaction and education.
It’s sad to think that a drone, being used in a benign way, can be shot out of the sky by just about anyone these days. I don’t know if you subscribe to the “if it’s flying then it’s spying” mentality of some but, just because you think it, doesn’t make it so.
Let’s see if we can make sense of this latest event…
THIS POST MAY CONTAIN AFFILIATE LINKS. PLEASE SEE OUR AFFILIATE DISCLOSURE FOR MORE INFORMATION.
What Was the Drone Doing?
The drone, a Mavic 2 Zoom, was engaged in the search for a missing dog by the name of Dezie around 4:45 PM. It was being used to provide an aerial view over a mile-long drainage ditch by a shuttered concrete company where Dezie was last seen when communication was lost by volunteers, Lynne Fondale and Teddy Henn, of the pet-finding group, Missing Angels Long Island. At first, they weren’t sure what happened, speculating that a bird had taken the drone out.
What Happened? Why Was it Shot Out of the Sky?
As Lynn and Teddy traced the drone’s path, using the last known GPS coordinates, they encountered a man who informed them that it had been shot down and pointed them to the suspect’s (Gerard Chasteen) home (pictured above). Authorities believe that three shotgun shells were fired into the air.
When they contacted Gerard, he admitted to shooting the drone down because he didn’t like it passing through his air space. Lynne asked “Did you shoot down our drone?” to which Gerard replied “Yeah, you can’t fly over my house”.
The two volunteers contacted the Suffolk County police who charged Chasteen with third-degree criminal mischief and prohibited use of a weapon as well as seized multiple shotguns from the properly. I wonder if destruction of property charges will be filed as the drone isn’t cheap at around $1300 US.
Apparently the claim of the drone flying over the home is in question as the volunteers provided law enforcement with the drones flight record, showing it did not fly over the property.
How Could This Be Avoided?
Education. People are suspicious or even fearful of what they don’t understand. You’ll get people that say “drones can be used for spying” or “drones can be weaponized” and, sure that may be true, but… Binoculars can be used for spying. Should we ban them? Vehicles can be weaponized? Should we shoot at every car that goes by? Obviously not.
If we can engage the general public in positive ways and show them the good drones can do the better off we, as a community will be. As more positive press revolving around drones is put out there, hopefully such incidents can be avoided.
For the suspect, court. For the drone community, get out there. Volunteer your services, fly at a local park (assuming you’re allowed to) and invite others to experience drones. Spread the word of drones doing good deeds on your social media feed (hint, hint).
It is a federal offense to shoot down drones. Shooting down a drone or unmanned aircraft is a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. § 32 and punishable with up to 20 years in jail.
“Amendments to 18 U.S.C. § 32 enacted in 1984 expand United States jurisdiction over aircraft sabotage to include destruction of any aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States or any civil aircraft used, operated or employed in interstate, overseas, or foreign air commerce.
This statute now also makes it a Federal offense to commit an act of violence against any person on the aircraft, not simply crew members, if the act is likely to endanger the safety of the aircraft.
In addition, the United States is authorized under the statute to prosecute any person who destroys a foreign civil aircraft outside of the United States if the offender is later found in the United States or, effective as of April 24, 1996, a national of the United States was aboard such aircraft (or would have been aboard if such aircraft had taken off) or a national of the United States was a perpetrator of the offense.”
Last year the FAA’s Reauthorization Bill was passed that allows the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice to take down drones. As such, only agents from either the DHS or DOJ are allowed to shoot down drones.
I suspect, news such as this, will continue to pop up from time to time. The reasons will vary from “you can’t fly over my property” to “I just thought it was fun” but I’m sure this isn’t the last incident.
It should be noted that, in the US, only the FAA has jurisdiction over airspace. Individuals and other entities such as cities and businesses do not. As such, they are not legally able to regulate whether or not you can fly over their property. That said, that may not stop them from trying to or taking other actions, such as shooting your drone out of the sky.
What are your thoughts? Was he justified in shooting a drone, engaged in a search for a missing dog, of the Sky? Do you have more details regarding this event? Have you had a similar experience? Do you have ideas on how to help reduce such incidents? Will more positive community interaction help with such matters? Please let me know by commenting below.
This is rather odd. Drones are becoming popular by the day and to think that a drone used for a useful purpose could be brought down by an unknown person leaves much to worry about in a civilized society.I believe there should be clear rules in owning and using a drone, but who will pass them? People usually get suspicious of anything that poses a threat to their privacy and will do anything to counteract it. Massive education is the key to forestalling such experiences reoccurring. Personally, I wouldn’t have reacted the way Gerard did. He went rather too far. He was wrong to have contravened the law and should face the charges levied on him. I would probably call law enforcement to alert them of a perceived trespass on my property.
You hit the nail on the head here. Education is the key to reducing or even eliminating such incidents. Sadly people (both private and public) think they own the airspace above their properties when, in fact, it’s all governed by the FAA (in the US anyway). Paranoia and incorrect assumptions lead to all kinds of issues. Contacting the authorities would have been a much better solution vs shooting it down.
Thanks for taking the time to comment,
Very interesting article. I’m based in the Caribbean so drones are not as popular over here as yet but I have heard comments around them being used to spy etc. I agree that more exposure to drones will help with this issue. I enjoy watching drone videos of beautiful landscape and seeing amazing scenic images that can be produced. In this article, hearing that the drone was being used to search for a missing dog, is another creative use for good so it’s unfortunate to hear that it didn’t end well.
Thanks for commenting. May I ask where in the Caribbean you are? I do a lot of sailing and SCUBA diving and I hit the Caribbean quite often.
Without more education and proper penalties when someone takes such actions on their own, it’s going to be difficult to avoid these types of scenarios.
Sadly, I have not heard if the dog was found or not.
Hi, I’m currently based in Barbados. Where do you sail and scuba dive?
I used to live in south Florida so I’d take last minute cruises for really cheap all over and did a lot of diving that way.
Diving: Mexico, Honduras, Jamaica, the BVI’s, Grenada, St. Vincent and the Grenadines and Bonaire.
Sailing: San Francisco, San Diego, the BVI’s, Grenada, St. Vincent an the Grenadines.